Implementation Notes

From semanticweb.org
Jump to: navigation, search

Here are some notes about the current implementation and the most common Relations and Attributes witch should be implemented later.

Why 'should'? There is no agreement in our development team on exactly these features. --140.203.154.12 21:08, 14 November 2005 (CET)

[edit] Recommendations for implementation

This is a List of the most important Attributes and Relations. Note that this is not a List about all common Attributes, but a list of ones witch needs hardcoding.

Also disagree :-) e.g. subClassOf could be probably be realised via TransitiveProperty, I guess. I am curious, why exactly these features? Where does the 'Importance' rating comes from? Very interesting... --140.203.154.12 21:08, 14 November 2005 (CET)


Original Name Attribute Name Importance implemented?
rdfs:subClassOf Property:is a high yes, using standard MediaWiki Categories
owl:sameAs Property:is same as high no
Property:context of high no
Property:true title medium no
owl:FunctionalProperty medium no
owl:SymmetricProperty medium no
owl:TransitiveProperty low no
owl:oneOf low no

'is a' is already covered by Categories, even in a more OWL-compatible way (no class of classes). --140.203.154.12 21:09, 14 November 2005 (CET)

[edit] See also

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
services
Toolbox